Insufficient data
Unranked

IPVanish Review

Unlimited devices and a self-owned server network — but a 2016 logging episode still defines its reputation, and genuine user sentiment is scarce.

Unlimited devicesOwns its serversUS jurisdiction2016 logging incidentInsufficient data

Why IPVanish is unranked (for now)

We won't fake a score we can't support. IPVanish's mentions on our public-discussion sources were dominated by affiliate-spam (one post was flagged dead by the community), and we couldn't verify its App Store rating this cycle — so there isn't enough clean signal to score it responsibly. We show it for transparency and will revisit as we add sources.

👥 Power-user sentiment: insufficient (spam-dominated)
Mainstream: rating pending verification
🔀 Blended score: withheld

At a glance

Category scores blend our public-sentiment data with independently reported testing (speed/streaming figures from review labs such as Security.org, CyberInsider, and vpnMentor). Where a number comes from testing rather than sentiment, we say so; "—" means too little signal to score.

Who it's for

✓ Get IPVanish if…

  • You want unlimited simultaneous connections on a self-owned network.
  • You're not a privacy maximalist and the 2016 history doesn't bother you.

✗ Skip it if…

  • You weigh the 2016 logging episode heavily.
  • You want US-jurisdiction risk minimized, or a strong independent-sentiment signal before buying.

Pricing reality

2-year intro around $2.19/mo, but the annual renewal is about $89.99/yr (~$7.49/mo) — roughly a +242% jump, the same renewal-shock pattern this site exists to flag.

See the renewal math →

Speed

Generally fast downloads, helped by owning its server network.

Streaming

Moderate — works with some services, not a streaming standout.

Torrenting & P2P

Good P2P support and unlimited connections; no port forwarding.

Privacy, security & audits

The defining issue: in 2016, IPVanish (under prior ownership) reportedly turned over user logs to US authorities despite a no-logs claim. New owners say practices changed and a later audit was conducted — but the episode is exactly the kind of thing that lingers, and the community remembers it.

"Recommended services I actually use: PureVPN, IPVanish… Credibility went out the door."— catlikesshrimp via Hacker News ↗

Jurisdiction & ownership

United States (5 Eyes). Owned by Ziff Davis — the media conglomerate that also owns CNET, PCMag, Mashable and others, which raises obvious review-conflict questions.

Apps & ease of use

Functional, with unlimited-device support.

Support

24/7 support available.

Specs

Price2-yr ~$2.19/mo intro · renews ~$7.49/mo (~+242%)
LogsNo-logs claim; 2016 logging incident on record
JurisdictionUnited States (5 Eyes)
ProtocolsWireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2
Port forwardingNo
StreamingModerate
OwnershipZiff Davis

Pros & cons

Pros

  • Unlimited simultaneous connections
  • Owns and operates its own servers
  • Fast downloads in many tests

Cons

  • 2016 logging incident still shadows it
  • US jurisdiction; Ziff Davis (media-conglomerate) owner
  • ~242% renewal hike
  • Real-user sentiment is scarce / spam-heavy

The bottom line

IPVanish has legitimate strengths — unlimited devices and a self-run network — but it carries the heaviest historical trust baggage in this set, and we simply don't have clean enough sentiment to score it yet. Treat this as provisional: capable on paper, unproven in our data, and remembered for 2016. We'll revisit once we can verify the signal.

How VPNInsider makes money — and why this isn't bought. IPVanish pays affiliate commissions; we still withhold a score rather than reward payout with a number we can't support — and we lead with the 2016 incident. That restraint is the brand. Refreshed monthly; see our methodology.

VPNInsider.org · IPVanish Review · sentiment + pricing updated monthly · this cycle June 2026 · facts verified against vendor and independent test sources.