P2P needs two things from a VPN: it won't keep logs, and it performs. Marketing claims are cheap — here's what actually holds up, scored on real user trust.
For torrenting, two things matter more than speed-test bragging rights: a no-logs policy that's actually been proven, and solid P2P support. Here's how the field stacks up — including one myth worth correcting.
P2P on most servers, port forwarding supported, an audited no-logs policy, Swiss jurisdiction, and strong speeds. The safest "just works" torrent VPN. (Full review →)
Port forwarding, MACE ad-blocking, a huge network, and a no-logs claim that's survived actual US court cases (it produced nothing, because it keeps nothing). The caveats are US jurisdiction and Kape ownership. (Full review →)
No account, no email, cash payment, and a no-logs claim a 2023 police search verified in the real world. No port forwarding since 2023, and weak streaming — but for pure privacy, nothing beats it. (Full review →)
Every VPN says "no logs." What separates these three is evidence: Mullvad's police search, PIA's court record, Proton's audits. For something as sensitive as torrenting, real proof beats a marketing line every time.
Proton for the best all-round torrent VPN, PIA for port forwarding plus a court-tested record, Mullvad for maximum anonymity. Ignore any guide that still credits Mullvad with port forwarding — that ended in 2023.
VPNInsider.org · Guide · updated monthly · June 2026.